Behavioural Domains

April 2017: Ramsey LE, Siegel JS, Lang CE, Strube GL & Corbetta M. (2017) Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke. Nature Human Behaviour, Early Online, DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0038

Abstract: We examined the patterns and variability of post-stroke recovery in multiple behavioural domains. A large cohort of first-time stroke patients with heterogeneous lesions was studied prospectively and longitudinally at one to two weeks, three months and one year after the stroke using structural magnetic resonance imaging to measure lesion anatomy and 44 neuropsychological tests to assess behavioural outcomes. Impairment was described at all time points by a few clusters of correlated deficits. The time course and magnitude of recovery was similar across behavioural domains, with change scores largely proportional to the initial deficit and most recovery occurring within the first three months. Damage to specific white matter tracts produced poorer recovery for several domains: attention (superior longitudinal fasciculus II/III), language (posterior arcuate fasciculus) and motor (corticospinal tract). Finally, after accounting for the severity of the initial deficit, language and visual memory recovery was worse for those with lower levels of education, while the occurrence of multiple deficits negatively impacted attention recovery.

One thought on “Behavioural Domains

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s